![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
Frum Jews having a pet at home
what are the Halakhic problems that could cause the fact of having a pet (a dog or a cat, for example)?
And how is it that it is unusual for frum jews to have a pet at home? (I noticed that many children of Meah Shearim, for example, are afraid of dogs.) I remember last year, in a discussion with my Mashpia, he told me a story involving a dog and told me that in the prewar period, there were many more religious Jews with a dog (but it was usually for guarding the house, for security measures).
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
Besides maybe Shabbas (depending if you hold pets are muktza or not) I cannot think of any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
I thought that an animal was automatically muktza! Who hold otherwise?
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
So, this apples also to pets?!
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
Ok, but the Gemoroh (in Shaabbos, but I don't remember the exact daf) says that animals are muktzah on Shabbes. R' Moshe Feinstein and R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (among others) held that pets are muktzah. I'm not aware of a single posek who held otherwise!
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
You said that:
So we cannot touch a pet who has died.
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
Did you look up the Rashi?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
Quote:
Like I said, there is discussion on this. Some are lenient. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
Yes I did.
Ho, sorry, I didn't read very well: ובנבלתם לא תגעו: יכול יהו ישראל מוזהרים על מגע נבלה, תלמוד לומר אמור אל הכהנים וגו' (ויקרא כא א), כהנים מוזהרין ואין ישראל מוזהרין. קל וחומר מעתה ומה טומאת מת חמורה, לא הזהיר בה אלא כהנים, טומאת נבלה קלה לא כל שכן. ומה תלמוד לומר לא תגעו, ברגל. זהו שאמרו חייב אדם לטהר עצמו ברגל So it doesn't apply to ordinary Jews only to Kohanim. The posuk came to teach us that only on yomim tovim, it is forbidden. Sorry.
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
Thank you. I'll try to check that reference when I get "free time". Now I must prepare myself for Mincha. Thanks for the source.
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
Today it would not apply to Kohanim either, as it is only relevant to avodah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
No, that addition is from the editor of the IM. A fascinating example of the complaint against that volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
R' Feinstein paskened that it was muktzah. I'm very sure of me.
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Executive Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 250
|
Quote:
Basar B'chalav: Your animal's food does not have to be kosher -- but it cannot be a product that was cooked with milk and meat together. I have hamsters right now and I'm almost positive that the pet store owners must think I'm nuts when I read the ingredients in a package of hamster food. Chametz on Pesach: Likewise, you cannot own, nor feed to your animals food that is chametz. For our hamsters, we give them various kitniyos products (which, we, as Ashkenazim cannot eat, but can be fed to our pets) such as millet, sunflower seeds, corn, etc.). For larger animals (dogs, cats, etc.) you may need to feed them actual meat and/or fish products for the duration. Neutering/spaying: For hamsters this isn't a big deal, but for dogs and cats it is. There are big problems with spaying or neutering an animal. Hiring a non-Jew to do is is likely to be a problem as well. I would think that buying one that is already spayed/neutered is not as much of a problem, but I would advise you to CYLOR. Walking your dog on Shabbos: Puttting aside potential issues of the animal being muktzah, if you live in an area without an eruv, using a leash could be problematic. Trapping on Shabbos: This could be an issue in certain circumstances. If you have company coming over and they're afraid of the dog, there may be issues with locking it in a room. As an aside, we had an issue with one of our hamsters a while ago. One of them escaped from his cage on a Shabbos afternoon. (It was really cute watching him climb up the stairs!) Not only could we not pick it up (due to muktzah issues -- which are Rabbinical in nature), we couldn't even "lure" him into a safe place until after Shabbos -- trapping animals is one of the 39 melachos. There may well be other issues involved, but those are some of the ones off the top of my head. It can be done -- we used to have two dogs and now we have hamsters -- but you have to be aware of potential issues. The Wolf (who is NOT a pet)
__________________
[url="http://wolfishmusings.blogspot.com"]WolfishMusings[/url] (my blog) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
Wolf, very nice. I was thinking more along the lines of halachik issues about the actual having of a pet, prerhaps even frowning against having a pet, not halochos that pertain to pets, hence my answer.. But - you obviously have experience the experience of actually owning one, which I am lacking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Executive Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 250
|
Quote:
The Wolf
__________________
[url="http://wolfishmusings.blogspot.com"]WolfishMusings[/url] (my blog) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
Well done. You look like a pro so I trust you. Thank you. I think we should think twice before having a dog or a cat.
Another question, but I think the answer is no: are we allowed to sterilize them?
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
on castration, I have fiound that some opinions are of the opinion that the prohibition does not apply to non-Jews and that laws regarding males and females are different, and so the question is very complicated, it would be better to get the guidance of a Rabbi.
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
Executive Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 250
|
I have experience with pets, but I'm not a Rav. As always, CYLOR.
Quote:
Quote:
The Wolf
__________________
[url="http://wolfishmusings.blogspot.com"]WolfishMusings[/url] (my blog) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
the prohibition of castrating males is DeOrayta, while some authorities believe that the prohibition to spay females is DeRabbanan. implying that if the prohibition is rabbinic a Jew has the right to entrust their pet to a non-Jew for surgery: Torah is not regarding the non-Jew as being concerned by rabbinical prohibitions at the request of the Jew, and the Jew does not violate the prohibition in this case to "place an obstacle before the blind".
Among those who paskened that it was a Rabbinical prohibition, The Turei Zahav (Taz) says that what is prohibited in the castration of males is the act of mutilating, creasing or crushing, in the words used in the psukim. Since the female reproductive organs are internalized, unlike the male, the act of castration, if we restrict ourselves to terms explicitly used by the biblical psukim, is directed only to the anatomical structures that cover the reproductive organs, and harm to the reproductive system itself is indirect: the prohibition of female sterilization is rabbinic. He adds, however, the prohibition of Tsaar Baalei chayim, prohibition of inflicting suffering on animals, in such cases. but as I said, others say that the prohibition is DeOraysa, as for males. Complicated...better not to have pets like dogs or cats. aAparently there is a little less problem with a hamster (I really don't want to buy pets, it's just a question that crossed my mind last week).
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
|
Yees, I forgot the source: Turei Zahav on E.Ch. 5:11. You can also see Igros Moshe, E;Ch 4:34. But not everyone agree.
(I have just realize that there is also another problem: Euthanasia: when the pet suffers, can we shoot it or not, etc.. So, finally, there are many more problems than I have thought.)
__________________
כל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
ChabadTalk.com Elder!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,986
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Secular Jews or non-observant Jews. | mj.stephens | General | 15 | 03-22-2010 08:00 AM |
| 11 Wounded by Gov't Clubs in Violent Expulsion of Jews from their home | noahidelaws | Eretz Yisrael - Israel | 0 | 06-22-2008 01:48 AM |
| jews and non jews in bikur cholim | mordechai7215 | Discuss Judaism | 2 | 08-17-2003 05:17 PM |