View Single Post
Unread 03-12-2010, 10:52 AM   #6
Wolf
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by adman View Post
From an article (via google):

In 1 Samuel 13, the battle between the Israelites and the Philistines at Michmash is described. Following military obstacles and a prolonged anticipation of Samuel’s arrival, Saul presents the burnt offering himself, though he was ordered in 1 Sam 10:8 to wait for Samuel. The resulting conflict between Samuel and Saul is presented in vv. 7-15a. Samuel delivers an oracle of judgment to Saul for his failure to heed the prophet’s command to await his arrival:

You have done foolishly; you have not kept the commandment of the Lord your God, which he commanded you. The Lord would have established your kingdom over Israel forever, but now your kingdom will not continue; the Lord has sought out a man after his own heart; and the Lord has appointed him to be ruler over his people, because you have not kept what the Lord commanded you.



---- I suppose it's possible that it refers to a promise that would have been made had certain preconditions been fulfilled/expectations met but since it was never actually made it was not technically revoked?
That would have been my argument as well. No such promise was made. It might have been at some point in the future, but it was not.

The Wolf
__________________
[url="http://wolfishmusings.blogspot.com"]WolfishMusings[/url] (my blog)
Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote